<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An ODE, Orthogonal Functions, and the Chebyshev Polynomials</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artent.net/2013/09/16/an-ode-orthogonal-functions-and-the-chebyshev-polynomials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artent.net/2013/09/16/an-ode-orthogonal-functions-and-the-chebyshev-polynomials/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re blogging machines!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:08:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hundalhh</title>
		<link>http://artent.net/2013/09/16/an-ode-orthogonal-functions-and-the-chebyshev-polynomials/#comment-1904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hundalhh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://162.243.213.31/?p=2098#comment-1904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if there is some way to know ahead of time or intuit that the result is going to be polynomial.  

I guess for any weight function, it&#039;s possible to get orthogonal polynomials, but the Chebyshev polynomials are so nice---integer coefficients and all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if there is some way to know ahead of time or intuit that the result is going to be polynomial.  </p>
<p>I guess for any weight function, it&#8217;s possible to get orthogonal polynomials, but the Chebyshev polynomials are so nice&#8212;integer coefficients and all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://artent.net/2013/09/16/an-ode-orthogonal-functions-and-the-chebyshev-polynomials/#comment-1899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://162.243.213.31/?p=2098#comment-1899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hum.. 
seems that Mr Tchebychev followed the same thinking path..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hum..<br />
seems that Mr Tchebychev followed the same thinking path..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePig</title>
		<link>http://artent.net/2013/09/16/an-ode-orthogonal-functions-and-the-chebyshev-polynomials/#comment-1879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ThePig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 16:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://162.243.213.31/?p=2098#comment-1879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post reminds me of a friend who used to chastise me when I used &quot;orthogonal&quot; when I meant &quot;independent.&quot;  For sin x and cos x are orthogonal but they are clearly not independent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post reminds me of a friend who used to chastise me when I used &#8220;orthogonal&#8221; when I meant &#8220;independent.&#8221;  For sin x and cos x are orthogonal but they are clearly not independent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: artent.net @ 2026-04-08 02:49:24 by W3 Total Cache -->